Where does NATO sit, in power sustainability?
Component One describes what Bullshit Industry suggests:
In other words, it indicates any kind of service that exists just for the benefit of “Developing tasks”, without actually adding anything of value, maybe even doing some real damage.
In every situation, those companies do harm by eating unneeded power, which has to come solely from minimal or limited Planet resources, like nonrenewable fuel sources , which we and all life in the world are currently enduring badly from.
Component one also offers the acid test for any company.
The question that needs to be asked of it is:
“Can, and would certainly it exist, in a 100 % solar powered world?”
If the response is no, after that we should actively stop it, due to the fact that till it is ceased, it is doing injury by creating unneeded use of nonrenewable fuel sources, or other Planet resources power.
So we may say NATO is needed due to the Ukraine battle.
However would certainly we be having that battle, if the world was solar energy?
The answer is No, due to the fact that the war is over nonrenewable fuel sources.
That is politically feasible obviously, particularly if we are driven in any kind of certain political direction.
However all of us know the solution in reality.
The battle mores than fossil fuels.
So, NATO falls short the examination.
NATO is massive Bullshit Company that we must quit doing, due to the fact that it is destroying our earth, and of course, us.